MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167704143 · doi:10.1164/rccm.201402-0338oc

Is Previous Respiratory Disease a Risk Factor for Lung Cancer?

2014· article· en· W2167704143 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rachel Denholm, Joachim Schüz, Kurt Straíf, Isabelle Stücker, Karl‐Heinz Jöckel, Darren R. Brenner, Sara De Matteis, P. Boffetta, Florence Guida, Irene Brüske, H.-Erich Wichmann, Maria Teresa Landi, Neil E. Caporaso, Jack Siemiatycki, Wolfgang Ahrens, Hermann Pohlabeln, Д Г Заридзе, John K. Field, Paul A. Demers, Neonila Szeszenia‐Dąbrowska, Jolanta Lissowska, P. Rudnai, Eleonóra Fabiánová, Rodica Stanescu Dumitru, Vladimír Bencko, Lenka Foretová, Vladimí­r Janout, Benjamin Kendzia, Susan Peters, Thomas Behrens, Roel Vermeulen, Thomas Brüning, Hans Kromhout, Ann Olsson

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research CentreCancer Care OntarioLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversité de MontréalAlberta Health Services
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthIstituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro Gli Infortuni sul LavoroInstitut National Du CancerInstitut de Veille SanitaireCancer Care OntarioDeutsche Gesetzliche UnfallversicherungRegione LombardiaAgence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du TravailFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleAgence Nationale de la RechercheWorld Health OrganizationWorkplace Safety and Insurance BoardEuropean CommissionRoy Castle Lung Cancer FoundationNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchFondation de France
KeywordsMedicineLung cancerChronic bronchitisOdds ratioInternal medicineRespiratory diseasePneumoniaBronchitisAsthmaRisk factorObstructive lung diseaseCancerCase-control studyLungCOPD

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations132
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207