MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167757469 · doi:10.1109/cjece.2009.5291204

Permittivity measurement of disk and annular dielectric samples using coaxial transmission line fixtures. part I: theory and formulation

2009· article· en· W2167757469 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersManitoba Hydro
KeywordsCoaxialDielectricTransmission lineOpticsPermittivityMaterials scienceFixtureAcousticsPhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One way of measuring the permittivity of circularly shaped dielectric samples is to measure the S-parameters of a two-port coaxial transmission line fixture into which the samples are placed. Among the sample forms that can be fitted into coaxial waveguides are (1) circular disks and (2) annular rings. The former type is sandwiched between two disjointed inner conductors of the coaxial line, whereas the latter dielectric form is snug-fitted to become the insulation layer of an intermediate coaxial section. Each type of sample requires a different coaxial configuration; this work studies both fixtures. The investigation of the first type is based on a previously studied technique that treats the sandwiched circular disk as a parallel-plate capacitor. Because of inaccuracies in the original form of that method, a modified version that offers improved accuracy is devised here. In addition, a new, independently developed technique for accurately characterizing dielectrics of the second form (annular-ring samples) using quadratic curve fitting is proposed. The experimental fixture, comprising a connected series of coaxial waveguide sections, is numerically treated with the method of moments and mode-matching technique. Details of the theoretical groundwork are presented in this paper, which constitutes the first of two parts of this work. Part II, also appearing in this issue, describes the measurement technique in detail and presents simulation results of the experimental procedure based on the formulation presented herein. In addition, the method that treats circular disks is also investigated in Part II and is used to make comparative performance studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it