MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167776541 · doi:10.1177/0278364909105274

Dual-channel Haptic Synthesis of Viscoelastic Tissue Properties using Programmable Eddy Current Brakes

2009· article· en· W2167776541 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew H. Gosline, Vincent Hayward

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Robotics Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTeleoperation and Haptic Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsActuatorHaptic technologyViscoelasticityTorqueDamperEddy currentElectrical impedanceMechanical impedanceComputer scienceComponent (thermodynamics)Control theory (sociology)Mechanical engineeringEngineeringSimulationControl engineeringMaterials sciencePhysicsElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a novel method for haptic synthesis of viscoelastic responses which employs a dual-channel haptic interface. It has motors that generate torque independently of velocity and brakes that generate viscous torque independently of position. In this way, twice as many states are directly accessible, which reduces reliance on observation and feedback. Torque-generating actuators, e.g. DC motors, are well known. For the viscous actuators, we use eddy current brakes as programmable, linear, non-contact, physical dampers. By decomposing a mechanical impedance to be realized into viscous and elastic components, we can dedicate each actuator to that component it is ideally suited to synthesize, dampers for the viscous component, and motors for the elastic component. The decomposition is in general not unique so it is possible to select the option that takes the best advantage of the hardware. Experimental results show that this technique can render a variety of viscoelastic models without the artifacts that can occur when synthesizing viscous components on conventional haptic interfaces. The synthesized mechanical impedances have guaranteed passivity, and can have arbitrarily high or low viscous and elastic components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Journal of Robotics ResearchSame topicTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsFrench-language works237,207