MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167788252 · doi:10.1152/ajplung.00310.2006

Statin therapy, alone or with rapamycin, does not reverse monocrotaline pulmonary arterial hypertension: the rapamcyin-atorvastatin-simvastatin study

2007· article· en· W2167788252 on OpenAlexaff
M. Sean McMurtry, Sébastien Bonnet, Evangelos D. Michelakis, Sandra Breuils Bonnet, Alois Haromy, Stephen L. Archer

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsSimvastatinMedicineAtorvastatinSirolimusPulmonary hypertensionStatinRight ventricular hypertrophyPharmacologyP70-S6 Kinase 1Internal medicineApoptosisPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by excessive pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell proliferation and impaired apoptosis leading to obstruction of resistance pulmonary arteries. We hypothesized that antiproliferative (rapamycin) and proapoptotic (statins) agents, already used clinically for other indications, would decrease experimental PAH, facilitating translation to human therapies. Prior studies in the rat monocrotaline-PAH model have indicated that simvastatin regresses and rapamycin prevents, but cannot reverse, PAH. Two PAH regression strategies (rapamycin monotherapy vs. rapamycin + atorvastatin) and one prevention strategy (simvastatin) were tested in a rat monocrotaline-PAH model. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to saline (n = 6) or monocrotaline (60 mg/kg ip, n = 36) treatment groups. Monocrotaline rats were randomized to gavage with vehicle, rapamycin (2.5 mgxkg(-1)xday(-1)), or rapamycin + atorvastatin (10 mgxkg(-1)xday(-1)) treatment groups, beginning 12 days post-monocrotaline. Echocardiographic and hemodynamic end points were assessed 2 wk later. Additional monocrotaline-PAH rats (n = 20) were randomized to vehicle or simvastatin (2 mgxkg(-1)xday(-1)) treatment groups and followed echocardiographically for 4 wk. Monocrotaline-PAH increased lung p70 S6 kinase phosphorylation, and this was reversed by rapamycin, confirming the biological activity of rapamycin. Despite the use of high doses, neither rapamcyin nor rapamycin + atorvastatin improved survival nor reduced PAH, vascular remodeling, and right ventricular hypertrophy. Although prophylactic simvastatin slowed PAH progression, by 4 wk PAH severity and mortality were not different from placebo. Apart from the new finding of p70 S6 kinase phosphorylation in monocrotaline-PAH, this is a negative therapeutic trial (none of these promising therapies improved monocrotaline-PAH). These negative results should be considered as human trials with these agents are underway (simvastatin) or proposed (rapamycin).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score0.907

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular PhysiologySame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207