MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167839456 · doi:10.1109/cib.2009.4925682

Secure and simplified access to home appliances using Iris recognition

2009· article· en· W2167839456 on OpenAlexaff
Arpita Mondal, Kaushik Roy, Prabir Bhattacharya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHome automationAccess controlAuthentication (law)BiometricsComputer networkComputer securityMulti-factor authenticationAuthentication protocolOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Moving towards an dasiaalways-onpsila, dasiamobilepsila and technology driven lifestyle, people are demanding greater technical triumph to make life more exciting, convenient and trouble-free. Automation at home has already started catering to this growing need. Another major motivating factor for this is the prospect of higher energy efficiency, greater control on home from remote locations and the decreasing cost of network-controlled home appliances. In this paper, we propose a novel scheme for accessing home appliances over the Internet using secure communication channel offered by secure socket layer (SSL) with mandatory certificate verification, perform user authentication using iris image, and then hash the biometric data to provide an impregnable three-factor security to the biometric data as well as user instructions while in transit between the user terminal and the home appliance. Additionally, we propose the use of a single authentication server for multiple residences, that would store users' sensitive biometric data, perform authentication, access control and quality of service, thereby reducing cost, effort, user dependability and improve security, acceptability and user-friendliness of home automation universally, together with SIP and UPnP protocols. The proposed approach proves to be more effective because of its well integrated three levels of security, less equal error, very small hash code used for authentication, lower computational complexity while matching, and thus, very fast response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207