MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167963571 · doi:10.1093/molbev/msh022

Heterogeneous Selection on LEGCYC Paralogs in Relation to Flower Morphology and the Phylogeny of Lupinus (Leguminosae)

2003· article· en· W2167963571 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Biology and Evolution · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyNonsynonymous substitutionPhylogenetic treeLineage (genetic)PhylogeneticsEvolutionary biologyNegative selectionMolecular evolutionPetalSynonymous substitutionGeneticsGeneBotanyCodon usage biasGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analysis of the molecular evolution of two LEGCYC paralogs in Lupinus (Genisteae: Leguminosae) reveals a varied history of site-specific and lineage-specific evolutionary rates and selection both within and between loci. LEGCYC genes are homologous to regulatory loci known to control floral symmetry and adaxial flower organ identity in Antirrhinum and its relatives. Within Lupinus, L. densiflorus is unusual in having flowers with a proportionally smaller standard (upright adaxial petals) and larger wings (lateral petals) than other lupin species. Phylogenetic estimates of the nonsynonymous/synonymous substitution rate ratio, omega, suggest that along the L. densiflorus lineage, positive selection (omega > 1) acted at some codon sites of one paralog, LEGCYC1B, and greater purifying selection (omega < 1) acted at some sites of the other paralog, LEGCYC1A. Overall, LEGCYC1A appears to be evolving faster than LEGCYC1B, and both paralogs are evolving faster than the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of nr DNA. The predominant historical pattern inferred is a highly heterogeneous "selectional mosaic" which we suggest may be typical of the teosinte branched 1-cycloidea-PCF (TCP) class of transcriptional activators, and possibly other genes. Codon models that do not account for both site-specific and lineage-specific variation in omega do not detect positive selection at these loci. We suggest a modification of existing branch-site models involving an additional omega parameter along the foreground branch, to account for the effects of both greater positive selection and greater purifying selection at different codon sites along a particular branch. The higher rates of evolution and congruent phylogenetic signal of both LEGCYC paralogs show promise for the use of these genes as markers for phylogeny reconstruction at low taxonomic levels in Genisteae [corrected]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it