Ultrastructure of irregular collagen fibrils of shark mandible
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sawada T. and Inoue S. 2011. Ultrastructure of irregular collagen fibrils of shark mandible. —Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 92: 62–66. Collagen fibrillogenesis was investigated in developing fibrous connective tissue (tooth band) in shark mandible by transmission electron microscopy. Fibrils varied considerably in shape and size. Both thin and thick fibrils 40–200 and 400–500 nm in width, respectively, were observed, with the latter showing irregular contours. Examination of both transverse and longitudinal sections of fibril suggested that the irregular, thick fibrils were formed by fusion of the thin fibrils. This was in agreement with a previously proposed mechanism of collagen fibrillogenesis in a variety of tissues, in which formation of thin fibrils is followed by their coalescence into thicker fibrils. Detailed high resolution ultrastructural examination revealed decorin-like, 4.5- to 5.5-nm-wide polygonal frames and 3-nm-wide ribbon-like structures previously identified as chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan ‘double tracks’ localized within the interfibrillar spaces. These structures may be closely involved in collagen fibrillogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".