Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of AFN–1252 Administered as Immediate Release Tablets in Healthy Subjects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: AFN-1252 is a novel inhibitor of FabI, an essential enzyme in Staphylococcus spp. This study was undertaken to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties of AFN-1252, following oral administration in an ascending dose trial. MATERIALS & METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-part study. In Part I, single doses (QD) of 100, 200, 300, or 400 mg AFN-1252 were administered. In Part II, subjects received 200, 400, 600, or 800 mg (total daily dose) where 100, 200 and 400-mg doses were given twice in one day. RESULTS: AFN-1252 was well-absorbed with Cmax at 3-4 h when given once per day and 2.5-9 h when dosed twice in a single dosing day. T½ ranged from 8 to 11 h. Total and peak exposures of AFN-1252 increased nonlinearly. Adverse events were primarily mild and resolved promptly. CONCLUSIONS: Oral doses of AFN-1252 were safe and well tolerated. AFN-1252 has the potential for once or twice-a-day dosing for treatment of staphylococcal infections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".