MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168097140 · doi:10.1080/10238160802449871

Investigation of residual stress in a bent Ti-clad Cu bus-bar by neutron diffraction and finite element modelling

2007· article· en· W2168097140 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neutron Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nuclear LaboratoriesAtomic Energy (Canada)Queen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNeutron diffractionMaterials scienceBent molecular geometryFinite element methodBar (unit)Residual stressDiffractionStress (linguistics)CrystallographyStructural engineeringComposite materialMetallurgyPhysicsOpticsEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Titanium-clad copper bus-bars are used to provide corrosion resistance in high temperature electrolytic cells. When cold-formed, such components will have a complex residual stress pattern. We report the investigation of residual stress in a high conductivity Cu bus-bar clad with Grade-2 Ti by neutron diffraction and finite element modelling. Straight bars were co-extruded, air-cooled and cold-stretched. The bars were cold-bent into an inverted ‘top-hat’ shape with four 90° bends. Residual stresses were investigated at the apex of a 90° bend. Three sets of measurements were performed in each of the measurement directions (transverse, normal and axial, relative to the straight bar): one set along the centre line in Cu; one set along the edge in Cu and one set along the edge in Ti. Residual stresses were then calculated in the three directions assuming both materials are elastically isotropic. The cooling, stretching and bending processes were simulated with an explicit finite element program, while the springback was modelled with dynamic relaxation. The neutron diffraction and finite element modelling results show reasonable agreement. Both materials exhibit unbalanced profiles relating to the combination of higher yield stress in the Ti cladding, and larger cross section of the copper bar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it