Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of fomepizole in the treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning in the absence of hemodialysis. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1966-May 2001) of English-language literature pertaining to the use of fomepizole in ethylene glycol poisoning was performed. Key search terms included fomepizole, ethylene glycol poisoning, and hemodialysis. References cited in those articles were also evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Results from a number of case reports and a prospective trial suggest that fomepizole is a safe and effective antidote in the treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning. CONCLUSIONS: Case reports and 1 prospective trial have shown that, in the absence of both renal dysfunction and significant metabolic acidosis, the use of fomepizole should obviate the need for hemodialysis. However, the decision to add hemodialysis in the treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning based on plasma ethylene glycol concentrations is still debatable. A randomized, controlled trial is needed to determine the exact criteria for adding hemodialysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".