MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168156601 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2007.4352935

Evidence of brain mitochondrial activities after oxygen inhalation by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3T

2007· article· en· W2168156601 on OpenAlexaff
Renhua Wu, Julien Poublanc, Danny Mandell, Garry Detzler, Adrian P. Crawley, Qingchun Qiu, Karel G. terBrugge, David J. Mikulis

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphocreatineInhalationNasal cannulaNuclear medicineChemistryOxygenNuclear magnetic resonanceMedicineAnesthesiaCannulaInternal medicinePhysicsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to explore mitochondrial activities after oxygen inhalation by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Six healthy volunteers were studied using a GE 3T scanner. A spin-echo MRS sequence was utilized with a GE service coil. TR was 2000 msec and TE 35 msec with 128 scan averages. Before 31P scan, a 1H MRS pre-scan was performed to obtain shimming values. Exact two 31P scans were performed before and after oxygen inhalation through nasal cannula at a flow rate of 10 L/min. Data were processed offline using the SAGE/IDL software. Peak integral values of inorganic phosphor, phosphocreatine, and ATPs were measured. Peak integral values of inorganic phosphor were decreased from 1.44% to 16.62% (mean+/-SD, 8.2+/-4.60). Peak integral values of phosphocreatine were increased from 1.06% to 8.64% (4.54+/-2.74). Peak integral values of gammaATP were increased from 0.75% to 15.97% (5.94+/-6.10); alphaATP from 1.21% to 16.05% (7.04+/-6.14); betaATP from 1.01% to 7.12% (3.08+/-2.30). Brain mitochondrial activities were increased and more ATPs were produced after oxygen inhalation in healthy volunteers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedingsSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesFrench-language works237,207