Changement institutionnel, stratégie concurrentielle, et performance: le cas de l'industrie des équipements de télécommunications en Amérique du Nord
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Dans cet article nous servons des entreprises d'équipements de télécommunications en Amérique du Nord pour étudier les liens qui existent entre les institutions, les stratégies concurrentielles des entreprises et leurs performances. De manière plus spécifique, comme cette industrie a connu un changement institutionnel majeur entre 1995 et 2000, nous examinons comment ce changement a affecté les stratégies des firmes et par conséquent leur performance. La structure de l'industrie en groupes stratégiques est considérée comme un facteur médiateur entre les changements institutionnels et les changements de performance. Les données sur les entreprises de l'industrie des équipements de télécommunication révèlent ainsi que les relations changement institutionnel‐structure concurrentielle‐performance sont fortes. Nous en avons alors tiré des conclusions importantes pour la relation institutions‐stratégies en suggérant notamment que pendant des périodes où les institutions sont stables, elles déterminent les stratégies des entreprises. Lorsqu'elles sont en changement, elles évoluent conjointement avec celles‐ci. De manière incidente, nous en avons déduit des conclusions sur les stratégies des entreprises non dominantes et sur la situation de la relation dans les pays en transition. Abstract In this paper, data from the North American telecommunication equipment industry are used to study the links between institutions, competitive strategies, and performance. More precisely, the paper examines the impact of the sector 1995–2000 major institutional changes on firms' strategies and performance. The study considers the structure of the industry in strategic groups as a mediating factor in the relationship between institutional change and firms' performance. The data available on telecommunication equipment industry firms show a strong link between institutional change, competitive structure, and performance. These data are used to make important assumptions on the relationship between institutions and strategies. It is our contention that when institutions are stable, they determine firms' strategies. On the other hand, when they are changing, the strategic behaviour changes as well. The last part of the study draws secondary conclusions on the strategies of non‐dominant firms and on the nature of the relationship in countries undergoing transition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".