Molecular typing of Mycobacterium intracellulare using multilocus variable-number of tandem-repeat analysis: identification of loci and analysis of clinical isolates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In addition to its known status as a disseminated disease in HIV-positive patients, Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is increasingly recognized as a causative pathogen of respiratory disease in HIV-negative patients. MAC is divided into Mycobacterium avium, and the less-epidemiologically studied Mycobacterium intracellulare. Genetic typing for M. intracellulare using variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) has not yet been developed. The aim of this study was to identify VNTR loci in the genome of M. intracellulare and apply them as an epidemiological tool to clinical isolates. Here, we identified 25 VNTR loci on the M. intracellulare genome, of which 16 showed variations among clinical isolates in the number of tandem repeat motifs. Among the 74 M. intracellulare isolates, 50 genotypes were distinguished using the 16 VNTR loci, resulting in a Hunter Gaston's discriminatory index of 0.988. Moreover, all 16 VNTR loci were stable in different sets of isolates recovered within time intervals ranging from 2 to 1551 days from 14 separate patients. These results indicate that for use as epidemiological markers of M. intracellulare, the loci in this VNTR assay are highly discriminating and stable over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".