Solid-state 115In NMR study of indium coordination complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The feasibility of solid-state (115)In NMR studies is demonstrated by an examination of four different coordination complexes: indium(III) acetylacetonate, indium(III) tris(tropolonato), indium(III) triiodide bis(tris(4-methoxyphenyl)phosphine oxide) and indium(III) trichloride tris(2,4,6-trimethoxyphenyl)phosphine. The results provide information about the electric field gradients and magnetic shielding at the indium nuclei through the nuclear quadrupolar and chemical shift parameters, respectively. The C(Q) values in these four complexes range between 106.0 +/- 2.0 and 200.0 +/- 4.0 MHz, while the magnetic shielding anisotropies fall in the range from 85 +/- 15 to 550 +/- 60 ppm. Finally, this research demonstrates that solid-state (115)In NMR studies are facilitated by performing experiments at the highest possible magnetic-field strengths, and that NMR offers a promising tool for the characterization of indium compounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".