MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168357324 · doi:10.1175/2010mwr3531.1

A General Filter for Stretched-Grid Models: Application in Cartesian Geometry

2010· article· en· W2168357324 on OpenAlexafffund
Dorina Surcel, René Laprise

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Weather Review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersMitacsCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
KeywordsFilter (signal processing)GridStencilComputer scienceConvolution (computer science)Variable (mathematics)Computational scienceAlgorithmIsotropyComputational complexity theoryDownscalingGeometryMathematical optimizationMathematicsMathematical analysisComputer visionOpticsArtificial intelligencePhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global climate models with variable resolution are effective means to represent regional scales over an area of interest while avoiding the nesting issues of limited-area models. The stretched-grid approach provides a dynamical downscaling approach that naturally allows two-way interactions between the regional and global scales of motion. Concentrating the resolution over a subset of the earth’s surface increases computational efficiency and reduces the computational costs compared to global uniform high-resolution models; however, it does not come free of some problems related to the variation of resolution. To address the issues associated with the stretching and anisotropy of the computational grid, a general convolution filter with a flexible response function is developed. The main feature of this filter is to locally remove scales shorter than a user-prescribed spatially varying length scale. The filtering effectiveness and computational efficiency of the filter can be custom tailored by an appropriate compromise between the filtering response and the width of the convolution stencil. This approach has been tested in one- and two-dimensional Cartesian geometry. It is shown that an effective filter can be obtained using a limited spatial stencil for the convolution to reduce computational cost, and that an adjustable spatially variable and nearly isotropic response can be obtained for application on variable grids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Weather ReviewSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207