On the Scattering Analysis Methods of and Reflection Characteristics for an AMC/AEC Surface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper initially presents an analysis of the electromagnetic scattering from a grounded dielectric slab loaded by a periodic conducting-strip grating using Floquet's modal expansions. The analysis treats any incident wave in an arbitrary plane, and having arbitrary angle and polarization. Explicit expressions are derived for the reflection coefficients of all harmonic modes. It is shown that this method is equivalent to the Galerkin Method of Moments (MoM) in the spectral domain. This means both methods result in the same matrix equation to be solved for the coefficients of the surface-current-density basis functions. Next, using this analysis method, the effects of various parameters on the reflection-coefficient phase of the aforementioned periodic structure is thoroughly studied. The parameters studied include the widths, dielectric permittivities, and thicknesses of the strips, as well as the plane, angle, and polarization of the incident wave. This parametric study shows that this structure can act as either an artificial magnetic conductor (AMC) or an artificial electric conductor (AEC), depending on the angle, polarization, and plane of the incident wave. However, the structure may not be able to maintain the distinct characteristics of an artificial magnetic conductor or an artificial electric conductor for all planes, angles, and polarizations of the incident wave. Some of the results are compared to the those obtained by commercial software packages, such as Ansoft's HFSS and Designer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".