Vertebral Fracture Assessment in Supine Position: Comparison by Using Conventional Semiquantitative Radiography and Visual Radiography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) performed with the patient in the supine position and conventional semiquantitative radiography of the spine by using conventional visual radiography of the spine as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional ethics review board; informed consent was obtained from the patients. A total of 250 consecutive patients (mean age, 62.0 years; range, 25-89 years) consisting of 190 women (mean age, 64 years; range, 25-89 years) and 60 men (mean age, 57.0 years; range, 27-83 years) who were suspected of having osteoporosis and who underwent VFA in the supine position and radiography of the spine were evaluated. VFA and semiquantitative radiography were analyzed by using a six-marker point method to describe the shape and deformity of each vertebra. Visual radiography of the lateral spine was performed by an experienced radiologist. The agreement between VFA, visual radiography, and semiquantitative radiography of semiquantitative graded fractures was assessed by using weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: Visual radiography helped identify 92 (36.8%) patients with at least one vertebral fracture (mean, 1.8 per patient). Most fractures were present in T7, T12, and L1. Excellent agreement was found between VFA and visual radiography, with 97.5% concordance and kappa = 0.82; VFA and semiquantitative radiography were in agreement in 97.4% of patients, with kappa = 0.83; and visual radiography and semiquantitative radiography were in agreement in 98.1%, with kappa = 0.87. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values calculated by lesion level for VFA compared with visual assessment were 83.6%, 99.1%, 84.1%, and 99.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: VFA performed with patients in the supine position is an accurate method to help detect vertebral fractures when compared with conventional spine radiography. VFA permits combination of fracture assessment with bone mineral density measurement in a single session.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".