MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168534866 · doi:10.1139/b07-132

Effects of heat stress on gas exchange and photosystem II (PSII) photochemical activity of <i>Phillyrea angustifolia</i> exposed to elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and subsaturating irradiance

2008· article· en· W2168534866 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Luca Vitale, Carmen Arena, A. Vírzo De Santo, N. D’Ambrosio

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to elevated CO2
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
KeywordsPhotoinhibitionPhotosynthesisPhotosystem IIChlorophyll fluorescenceCarbon fixationElectron transport chainPhotochemistryBotanyBiologyPhotosystemChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements were performed simultaneously on leaves of Phillyrea angustifolia L. to assess the effects of heat stress (30 min at 40 °C) on photosynthesis and photosystem II (PSII) photochemical efficiency of plants grown at ambient CO 2 and exposed to an elevated CO 2 concentration (800 µmol·mol –1 ) and 300 µmol photons·m –2 ·s –1 . No significant difference was found in the heat-induced decreases of net photosynthesis (P N ), quantum yield of PSII electron transport (Φ PSII ), and maximum PSII photochemical efficiency (F v /F m ) between plants exposed to ambient and elevated CO 2 concentrations, showing that elevated CO 2 was not able to reduce the potential for photoinhibition at high temperatures under moderate light conditions. The heat-induced decrease of P N was higher than that of Φ PSII indicating that reductive power was more utilized in non-assimilatory processes than in CO 2 fixation at both CO 2 treatments. This result suggested that impairment of the Calvin cycle rather than electron transport inhibition was the main cause of the limitation in CO 2 fixation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicPlant responses to elevated CO2French-language works237,207