MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168570106 · doi:10.1002/chem.200501182

Direct versus Mediated Through‐Space Magnetic Interactions: A First Principles, Bottom‐Up Reinvestigation of the Magnetism of the Pyridyl‐Verdazyl:Hydroquinone Molecular Co‐Crystal

2006· article· en· W2168570106 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetism in coordination complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadicalStack (abstract data type)MagnetismChemistryHydroquinoneCrystal (programming language)Space (punctuation)CrystallographyCondensed matter physicsChemical physicsPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanism of the magnetic interaction in the pyridyl-verdazyl radical:hydroquinone (pyvd:hq) molecular co-crystal is important as it has been suggested to originate by a unique "mediated through-space" magnetic interaction. This interaction was proposed to magnetically connect two nonadjacent pyridyl-verdazyl radicals within a pi stack, where adjacent radicals pile up in a head-over-tail orientation. The connection is made through a third radical sitting between the previous two mediated radicals. Given the relevance of this proposal, we decided to reinvestigate the magnetic properties of this co-crystal by using our recently proposed first-principles "bottom-up" procedure. Based on B3LYP/6-31+G(d) and CASSCF(6,6)/6-31+G(d) calculations (the results of which are identical to those provided by CASSCF(10,10)/6-31+G(d) calculations), we have computed the microscopic J(AB) values for all direct through-space magnetic interactions between nearby pyridyl-verdazyl radicals. The magnetic interactions give rise to two dominant values of similar strength: -56 and -54 cm(-1) at the B3LYP level, which are calculated as -38 and -31 cm(-1) at the CASSCF(6,6) and CAS(10,10) levels (all other interactions being smaller than |1| cm(-1)). The dominant interactions correspond to the direct through-space interaction between two adjacent radicals of a pi stack. The crystal also exhibits a radical-mediated through-space interaction of -0.31 cm(-1) between two nonadjacent radicals of a pi stack. The direct through-space magnetic interactions are two orders of magnitude larger than the mediated through-space interaction. Thus, first-principles calculations do not support a mediated through-space mechanism to explain the magnetism of the pyvd:hq co-crystal. The magnetic topology generated by the two dominant antiferromagnetic interactions in the pyvd:hq co-crystal consists of one-dimensional (1D) alternating chains (interacting very weakly along the b and c axes). By using this topology, the computed macroscopic magnetic susceptibility curve reproduces the experimental one properly. This first-principles bottom-up description of the magnetism in the pyvd:hq co-crystal differs in some fundamental aspects from that previously proposed in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it