MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168574124 · doi:10.1136/thx.2010.150946.14

S113 The effect of small airways disease and emphysema on the association between smoking and lung function, and bronchodilator response

2010· article· en· W2168574124 on OpenAlexaff
B. D. Patel, Harvey O. Coxson, Pat G. Camp, Sreekumar Pillai, Àlvar Agustí, Peter M.A. Calverley, Claudio F. Donner, Barry J. Make, N L Müller, S. I. Rennard, Jørgen Vestbo, Emiel Wouters, William H. Anderson, Peter D. Paré, Robert D. Levy, Edwin K. Silverman, David A. Lomas

Bibliographic record

VenueThorax · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCOPDBronchodilatorLung functionAirwayInternal medicineCardiologyPulmonary function testingAir trappingLung volumesLungAsthmaSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction and objectives</h3> The airflow limitation of COPD results from small airway disease and emphysema. These phenotypes are likely to have independent genetic risk factors. It is not known if the heterogeneity of COPD accounts for the relatively weak association between pack-years smoked and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) seen within smoking populations, or bronchodilator response (BDR). This study aimed to assess the effect of these phenotypes on the association between smoking and FEV<sub>1</sub> and on BDR. <h3>Method</h3> The international COPD genetics network is a multi-centre study aimed at identifying genes that predispose to COPD, in which high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) was used to quantify components of the COPD phenotype: (i) emphysema detected by radiologists (RE), (ii) emphysema assessed as per cent low-attenuation area (%LAA) and (iii) airway wall thickness (AWT) for airways with an internal perimeter of 10 mm (Pi10), 20 mm (Pi20), and average per cent wall area (WA%). They were then assessed for their effect on the association between smoking and lung function (FEV<sub>1</sub>% predicted (FEV<sub>1</sub>%)), and on BDR. <h3>Results</h3> RE data were available for 1159 individuals, 745 had complete data for Pi10, Pi20, AWT% and %LAA. The association between pack-years smoked and FEV<sub>1</sub>% was greater in those without (r=−0.41), compared to those with, RE (r=−0.12, p&lt;0.001 for difference in effect). AWT and RE correlated with FEV<sub>1</sub>% but had different relationships with smoking; AWT was positively associated with pack-years but there was no relationship between RE severity and pack-years smoked. RE, %LAA and AWT made independent contributions to FEV<sub>1</sub>%. Post-bronchodilator increase in FEV<sub>1</sub> was inversely associated with severity of RE (Abstract S113 Table 1), even after adjustment for pre-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub> (p&lt;0.01). BDR was also inversely associated with %LAA (p=0.02, and p≤0.05 adjusted for baseline FEV<sub>1</sub>). <h3>Conclusion</h3> The AWT component of COPD, but not the severity of RE, increases with pack-years smoked, and the association between pack-years and FEV1% is greatest in those with an airway predominant phenotype. This suggests different gene-smoking interactions between phenotypes. RE and %LAA independently contribute to FEV1% and therefore measure different components of emphysema, however both were inversely associated with BDR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThoraxSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207