MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168575327 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2006.885578

Sparse Macromodeling for Parametric Nonlinear Networks

2006· article· en· W2168575327 on OpenAlexaff
Min Ma, Roni Khazaka

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemModel order reductionParametric statisticsReduction (mathematics)Computer scienceFrequency domainInterconnectionRange (aeronautics)MicrosystemElectronic engineeringMathematical optimizationControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Model-order reduction has proven to be an effective tool for addressing the simulation complexities of the modern microsystem such as the ones arising due to large interconnect networks. Traditional model-order reduction methods are frequency-domain methods and are, therefore, limited to linear networks. Recently, time-domain model-order reduction was developed extending this concept to nonlinear macromodels. However, the resulting reduced nonlinear macromodel is dense, which reduces the efficiency of the simulation. In this paper, a nonlinear parametric formulation suitable for sparsification is presented. This results in an efficient reduced-order nonlinear macromodel, which is sparse, and is valid over a range of parameter values, and is thus suitable for optimization and design space exploration. Numerical examples are shown to illustrate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207