MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nonmarine Sequence Stratigraphy: Updip Expression of Sequence Boundaries and Systems Tracts in a High-Resolution Framework, Cenomanian Dunvegan Formation, Alberta Foreland Basin, Canada

2001· article· en· W2168634824 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAAPG Bulletin · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeland basinGeologySequence stratigraphyPaleontologySequence (biology)Structural basinCenomanianFaciesGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ten allomembers, labeled J-A, have been mapped in the deltaic Dunvegan Formation using 2340 wells and 63 outcrop sections. Each allomember spans about 200 k.y., is bounded by regional transgressive surfaces, and consists of 3-10 component shingles, apparently of autogenic origin. Allomembers H-E are discussed in this article. Their internal stacking patterns and bounding surfaces permit interpretation as depositional sequences. Sequences H-F have a sigmoidal-prismatic geometry, downlap to the southeast, and thin northwest onto the coastal plain. No differential thickening exists toward the orogen in the southwest. In contrast, sequence E thickens markedly toward the northwest. The tabular geometry of sequences H-F suggests accommodation was controlled by sea level change, whereas the wedge geometry of sequence E suggests significant tectonic tilting. Subaerial unconformities that bound valleys and extend onto adjacent interfluve paleosols can be traced 120-330 km updip into outcrop. The base of each sequence is characterized by shoreline backstep of 80-150 km. Transgressive and highstand shingles in each sequence comprise marine deltaic deposits that pass landward into coastal plain strata. Falling-stage shingles offlap seaward with little or no nonmarine equivalents updip, whereas lowstand shingles show renewed coastal onlap. In outcrop, three nonmarine systems tracts are recognized: (1) A channel-dominated, low-accommodation systems tract fills valleys up to 35 m deep and is equivalent to the early transgressive systems tract. (2) A lacustrine-dominated, high-accommodation systems tract comprises mudstone enclosing ribbon channel sandstones, blankets interfluves, and forms the bulk of each sequence. It is equivalent to late transgressive and early highstand systems tracts. (3) A paleosol-dominated, low-accommodation systems tract occupies the upper part of each sequence and is capped by the sequence boundary. It is equivalent to the late highstand systems tract. Sequence-bounding interfluve paleosols represent tens of thousands of years of pedogenesis related to slow aggradation, followed by fluvial entrenchment and clastic bypass, and represent the late highstand, falling-stage, lowstand, and early transgressive systems tracts. Coastal plain deposits record only part (perhaps <50%) of the time represented by each sequence. Updip sediment bypass promoted falling-stage delta progradation, characterized by offlap. These observations imply that, in this example, the subaerial sequence boundary and fluvial valleys formed initially in updip areas and expanded progressively seaward.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it