MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Invasive mold infections in iatrogenically immunocompromised children: An eight‐yr review

2008· article· en· W2168652436 on OpenAlexaffabout
Abdulkader Al‐Rezqi, Michael Hawkes, John Doyle, Susan E. Richardson, Upton Allen

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Transplantation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)Internal medicineRetrospective cohort studyCancerAspergillosisTransplantationLeukemiaPediatricsSurgeryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IMI are emerging as an important cause of mortality and morbidity among the growing number of immunocompromised children. A retrospective chart review was performed in all patients with a proven diagnosis of IMI over an eight-yr period (1997-2004) at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada to document the incidence, clinical spectrum, microbiology, treatment, and outcome of pediatric IMI. Twenty-eight patients developed IMI over the study period (10 cancer, 12 HCT, and six SOT patients). IMI occurred in 0.51%, 2.2% and 3.2% after a median time of 118, 60 and 71 days, among cancer, HCT and SOT recipients, respectively. Aspergillus spp. infection was diagnosed most commonly (23 patients) and the most common site of infection was the lung (21 patients). Patients at increased risk included those with acute myelogenous leukemia, allogeneic unrelated HCT recipients, graft-versus-host disease, and lung transplant recipients. The mortality after one yr was 60% among cancer patients, 58% among HCT patients, and 16% among SOT patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric TransplantationSame topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFrench-language works237,207