Mechanism of inhibition of the prothrombinase complex by a covalent antithrombin-heparin complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Factor-Xa assembly into the prothrombinase complex decreases its availability for inhibition by antithrombin + unfractionated heparin (AT + UFH). We have developed a novel covalent antithrombin-heparin complex (ATH), with enhanced anticoagulant actions compared with AT + UFH. The present study was performed to extend understanding of the anticoagulant mechanisms of ATH by determining its inhibition of Xa within the critical prothrombinase. Discontinuous inhibition assays were performed to determine final k(2) values for inhibition of Xa. Fluorescent microscopy was conducted to evaluate inhibitor-prothrombinase interactions. The k(2) for inhibition of prothrombinase versus free Xa by AT + UFH was lower, whereas for ATH were much higher. Relative to intact prothrombinase, rates for Xa inhibition by AT + UFH in complexes devoid of prothrombin/vesicles/factor-Va were higher. For ATH, exclusion of prothrombin decreased k(2), removal of vesicles increased k(2) and exclusion of factor-Va gave no effect. While UFH may displace Xa from prothrombinase, Xa is detained within prothrombinase during ATH reactions. We confirm prothrombinase hinders inhibitory action of AT + UFH, whereas ATH is less affected with prothrombin being a key component in the complex responsible for the opposing effects. Overall, the results suggest that covalent linkage between AT-heparin assists access and neutralization of complexed Xa, with concomitant inhibition of prothrombinase function compared with conventional non-conjugated heparin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".