Systemic blockade of nicotinic and purinergic receptors inhibits ventilation and increases apnoea frequency in newborn rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We hypothesized that the combined blockade of peripheral cholinergic and purinergic receptors alters the baseline breathing pattern and respiratory responses to carotid body stimuli (hypoxia, hyperoxia and hypercapnia). Rat pups at 4 (P4) and 12 days of postnatal age (P12) received an intraperitoneal injection of either saline vehicle or hexamethonium + suramin (Hex, 1 mg kg(-1), nicotinic receptor antagonist; Sur, 40 mg kg(-1), P2X receptor antagonist; both of which act mainly on peripheral receptors). Compared with the control animals (saline-injected rats), the Hex + Sur-treated rats demonstrated the following features: (1) decreased baseline ventilation and increased frequency of apnoea and breath-by-breath irregularities, with a larger effect in the P4 than in the P12 rats; (2) a decreased peak minute ventilation and respiratory frequency response to hypoxia (fractional inspired oxygen 12%), with a greater effect in the P12 than in the P4 rats; (3) an attenuated decline of the respiratory frequency during hyperoxia (fractional inspired oxygen 50%) to a similar magnitude in rats of both ages; and (4) a decreased hypercapnic ventilatory response (fractional inspired carbon dioxide 5%) to a similar magnitude in rats of both ages. We conclude that the cholinergic nicotinic and purinergic P2X receptors are essential to maintain an adequate baseline pattern in normoxia. They also contribute, albeit not exclusively, to the hypoxic ventilatory response, with an age-specific effect, most probably linked to the cholinergic component, which might partly underlie the postnatal maturation of peripheral chemoreceptors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".