MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168705075 · doi:10.1093/intimm/dxl025

CD4+ T cell-independent maintenance and expansion of memory CD8+ T cells derived from in vitro dendritic cell activation

2006· article· en· W2168705075 on OpenAlexafffund
Meiqing Shi, Jim Xiang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Immunology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Cancer AgencyUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCytotoxic T cellPriming (agriculture)Cell biologyAntigen-presenting cellCD8BiologyInterleukin 21T cellAdoptive cell transferInterleukin 12CD40Natural killer T cellChemistryIn vitroAntigenImmunologyImmune systemBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CD4+ T cells are essential for the maintenance of CD8+ memory T (Tm) cells following acute infection, but the importance of CD4+ T cells for the maintenance and expansion of CD8+ Tm cells to non-infectious antigens remains mostly unknown. Here, we showed that ovalbumin (OVA)-specific CD8+ Tm cell precursors derived from in vitro stimulation of TCR transgenic OT I CD8+ T cells with OVA protein-pulsed bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (DCOVA) can give rise to functional CD8+ Tm cells after adoptively transferred into mice. These CD8+ Tm cells can be maintained and remain fully functional in CD4+ T cell-absent environments in vivo. Furthermore, CD4+ T cells are not essential for the expansion of these CD8+ Tm cells. Finally, these in vitro DCOVA-activated CD8+ Tm cells maintained in CD4-deficient mice are also able to confer fully protective immunity against a later challenge of OVA-expressing tumor cells. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that in contrast to acute infections, maintenance and expansion of CD8+ Tm cells after priming with OVA protein-pulsed dendritic cells are independent of CD4+ T cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational ImmunologySame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207