Development of an axial microturbine for a portable gas turbine generator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A miniature gas turbine is under development with the aim of generating electrical energy from fuel. This system consists of a compressor, combustion chamber, turbine and generator. The turbine is a single-stage axial impulse turbine (Laval turbine) with a rotor diameter of 10 mm, made of stainless steel using die-sinking electro-discharge machining. It has been tested with compressed air to speeds up to 160 000 rpm and generates a maximum mechanical power of 28 W with an efficiency of 18.4%. When coupled to a small generator, it generates 16 W of electrical power, which corresponds to an efficiency for the total system of 10.5%. The power density is mainly limited by the maximal speed of the ball bearings. The main losses are the blade profile losses and the exit losses. Higher speeds can considerably reduce the exit losses and therefore increase efficiency and power density. An improved turbine has been tested at temperatures up to 360 °C and generates up to 44 W of electrical energy with a total efficiency of 16%. A 20 mm diameter centrifugal compressor matching the pressure and flow characteristics of the turbine has been designed and is currently under construction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".