Water Redistribution within the Potato Root Zone Following Irrigation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monitoring crop water uptake and soil water movement within the root zone is critical for designing drainage systems. The objective of this study was to monitor the water movement within the root zone after the soil was fully saturated by irrigation. This experiment was conducted in Winkler, Manitoba, in a potato field instrumented with 15 Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) miniprobes embedded in a vertical plane within the root zone for each replicate. The TDR miniprobes were installed at five different depths (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 m) and at three different radial distances (0.15, 0.3, 0.45 m) from the base of the potato plant. Three such replicates of TDR probes were installed at vertical planes located one meter apart. A 5 m by 5 m area was blocked off, and 50 mm depth of water was applied to bring the soil to saturation within this area. The initial water content measurement prior to this irrigation event and at periodic intervals thereafter was carried out over a four-day period. In general, the volumetric water content showed an increasing trend with depth during the four-day period. However, with time, the water content decreased in every layer except the deepest layer indicating upward movement of water from below the root zone. The results also showed that moisture depletion in the upper layers of soil was replenished overnight. The overnight increase in water content within the root zone can be attributed to capillary rise of water from below the root zone as well as hydraulic lift caused by the potato plants. Hydraulic lift is a phenomenon in which the plant roots act as a conduit, for water transport from deeper layers of soil to the drier shallower layers within the rootzone. This process is enhanced further in the absence of transpiration during the night. This paper presents evidence of this phenomenon in potato plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".