Exogonadal Oogenesis in a Temperate Holothurian
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unusual structures were detected on the visceral peritoneum of the ovarian tubules in about 5%-10% of female sea cucumbers (Cucumaria frondosa) collected off Newfoundland, eastern Canada. The condition varied from mild to severe, with localized castration observed in the most heavily affected tubule sections. Investigation of the structures using histology, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and gene analysis revealed that they were oocytes at different stages of development, growing singly or in groups of up to six. Their size and composition were consistent with those of oocytes found in the lumen of the ovaries, although "exogonadal" oocytes were devoid of a vitelline coat and presented few cortical granules. TEM sections suggest that the atypical oocytes emerged from the peritoneum and grew toward the coelomic cavity, and that they were not in direct contact with the basal lamina or the inner germinal layers. Similar masses have been observed in C. frondosa from the Gulf of St. Lawrence (Québec, Canada) and the Barents Sea (Russia), and in C. japonica from Russia and Psolus fabricii from Canada. The possibility that exogonadal oogenesis is attributable to anthropogenic disturbances should be investigated even though some of the affected specimens originate from presumably pristine locations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".