Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases and their roles in phagosome maturation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phagosome maturation is a highly organized and sequential process that results in the formation of a microbicidal phagolysosome. This results in crucial contributions to innate and adaptive immunity through pathogen clearance and antigen presentation. Thus, it is important to understand the regulatory networks that control the extent and nature of phagosome maturation. PI3Ks are lipid kinases that catalyze the phosphorylation of the 3' position of the inositol ring. This enzyme family is divided into three classes based on structure and substrate preferences. Previously, only the class III PI3K, hVps34, was thought to contribute to phagosome maturation. Recent evidence, however, suggests important contributions by class I PI3Ks in bringing about the diverse phagosome maturation phenotypes. Class I PI3Ks have also been implicated in the activation of Rab GTPases that function in maturation, such as Rab14. In addition, recent studies have illuminated the overlap between phagosome maturation and autophagy, which itself is regulated by multiple classes of PI3K. Taken together, a picture of phagosome maturation is emerging in which multiple classes of PI3Ks are involved in modulating maturation phenotypes. This review summarizes the known contributions of PI3Ks to phagosome maturation. Special emphasis is placed on the impact of PI3Ks on different maturation outcomes stemming from the engagement of diverse phagocytic receptors and on Rab and Ca(2+) signaling cascades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".