Regulation of airway smooth muscle RhoA/ROCK activities by cholinergic and bronchodilator stimuli
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current study set out to compare the temporal relationships of Rho activity, Rho kinase (ROCK) activity and tone following cholinergic stimulation in the presence and absence of three different bronchodilators. Bovine trachea challenged with a half-maximally effective concentration of carbachol (CCh) was flash-frozen at different times, then assayed for Rho (rhotekin pull-down assay) and ROCK (Western blot; radiometric assay) activities. Rho was activated within 30 s, followed by ROCK (peak at 2 min); both returned to baseline by 20 min, although tone continued to rise over that period. Increasing the concentration of CCh greatly increased the magnitudes and rates of stimulation of Rho, ROCK and tone. These CCh-induced changes were next compared in tissues pre-treated with isoproterenol, salmeterol or the nitric oxide donor S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP). Neither the time course nor the magnitude of Rho-activation were reduced by the beta-agonists; SNAP slowed Rho activation but it did not alter the peak magnitude. These observations were mirrored in ROCK activation and contraction. When tissues were pre-constricted with CCh and then challenged with the bronchodilators, however, all three agonists reversed cholinergically stimulated Rho, ROCK and myosin light chain kinase activities as well as tone. In conclusion, bronchodilators can suppress RhoA and Rho kinase activities, although their major effect appears to be on myosin light chain kinase activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".