BLADDER EXSTROPHY ASSOCIATED WITH COMPLETE URETHRAL DUPLICATION: A RARE MALFORMATION WITH EXCELLENT PROGNOSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: We report the association of complete urethral duplication and bladder exstrophy in 5 males, and describe the main characteristics to achieve diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1983 to 2000, 5 males with single bladder exstrophy and complete urethral duplication were seen at 3 institutions. Although bladder exstrophy was obvious at birth, only 1 patient had the preoperative diagnosis of associated urethral duplication. All patients were evaluated with abdominal ultrasound, voiding cystourethrogram after bladder closure and cystoscopy. RESULTS: All patients were totally incontinent, including 4 after primary bladder exstrophy closure. Although it was initially unnoticed by the urologist, most patients had leakage from the tip of the penis during the Valsalva maneuver. In all cases bladder exstrophy was single and deeply situated in the pelvis with excellent elasticity. All patients had a normal sized penis with less severe dorsal chordee and conical shaped glans. The duplicate epispadiac urethra did not have a verumontanum. Only 1 of the 5 patients had the correct diagnosis made before primary closure of bladder exstrophy, while in the other 4 diagnosis of a duplicate ventral urethra was made at the time of epispadias or fistula repair. There were no other associated malformations. In all cases the dorsal epispadiac urethral plate was excised and bladder emptying occurred through the ventral urethra, which at cystoscopy had a normal verumontanum. Postoperatively, all patients became continent and voided with good flow through the ventral urethra and, as opposed to many cases of exstrophy and epispadias, had normal size and excellent cosmesis of the penis. CONCLUSIONS: Complete urethral duplication is a rare variant of the exstrophy-epispadias complex. Patients with this anomaly present with a larger and more deeply situated bladder plate than classical exstrophy and a larger penis. A high index of suspicion is necessary to make a preoperative diagnosis. Excision of the dorsal urethral plate and maintenance of the ventral urethra are the treatment of choice, resulting in a continence and normal voiding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".