MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168899021 · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66223-4

BLADDER EXSTROPHY ASSOCIATED WITH COMPLETE URETHRAL DUPLICATION: A RARE MALFORMATION WITH EXCELLENT PROGNOSIS

2001· article· en· W2168899021 on OpenAlexaff
João L. Pippi Salle, H. Sibai, Avrum I Jacobson, M. FEHRI, Alex Brzezinski, Yves Homsy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBladder exstrophyMedicinePenisPediatric urologySurgeryEpispadiasVoiding cystourethrogramCystoscopyUrologyAnatomyUrinary systemVesicoureteral refluxInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: We report the association of complete urethral duplication and bladder exstrophy in 5 males, and describe the main characteristics to achieve diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1983 to 2000, 5 males with single bladder exstrophy and complete urethral duplication were seen at 3 institutions. Although bladder exstrophy was obvious at birth, only 1 patient had the preoperative diagnosis of associated urethral duplication. All patients were evaluated with abdominal ultrasound, voiding cystourethrogram after bladder closure and cystoscopy. RESULTS: All patients were totally incontinent, including 4 after primary bladder exstrophy closure. Although it was initially unnoticed by the urologist, most patients had leakage from the tip of the penis during the Valsalva maneuver. In all cases bladder exstrophy was single and deeply situated in the pelvis with excellent elasticity. All patients had a normal sized penis with less severe dorsal chordee and conical shaped glans. The duplicate epispadiac urethra did not have a verumontanum. Only 1 of the 5 patients had the correct diagnosis made before primary closure of bladder exstrophy, while in the other 4 diagnosis of a duplicate ventral urethra was made at the time of epispadias or fistula repair. There were no other associated malformations. In all cases the dorsal epispadiac urethral plate was excised and bladder emptying occurred through the ventral urethra, which at cystoscopy had a normal verumontanum. Postoperatively, all patients became continent and voided with good flow through the ventral urethra and, as opposed to many cases of exstrophy and epispadias, had normal size and excellent cosmesis of the penis. CONCLUSIONS: Complete urethral duplication is a rare variant of the exstrophy-epispadias complex. Patients with this anomaly present with a larger and more deeply situated bladder plate than classical exstrophy and a larger penis. A high index of suspicion is necessary to make a preoperative diagnosis. Excision of the dorsal urethral plate and maintenance of the ventral urethra are the treatment of choice, resulting in a continence and normal voiding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicUrological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207