MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2168909189 · doi:10.1109/sbec.1995.514424

Changes in tearing pressure with the geometry of dissections in porcine aortas

2002· article· en· W2168909189 on OpenAlexaff
Chang M. He, Margot R. Roach

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTearingBleb (medicine)Lumen (anatomy)Materials scienceShear stressAnatomyBiomedical engineeringMedicineIntraocular pressureSurgeryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dissecting aneurysms, or dissections, occur in large arteries by creating a false lumen in the media which is parallel to the true lumen. A tensile force is needed to tear the arterial wall in dissections. This tensile force could be produced in response to the pressure in the false lumen. In this study, tearing pressure was investigated. The studies were done in vitro on fresh isolated porcine thoracic aortas which were pressurized to 130 mmHg (physiological mean pressure). A volume of diluted India ink was injected into the media of the aortic wall to create a cavity called a "bleb". As the size of the bleb increased, the media was dissected. The difference between the pressure inside the bleb and that in the lumen was measured, and defined as tearing pressure. Ten pig thoracic aortas were studied. The results showed that tearing pressure decreased with the volume of blebs at the beginning when the blebs were first formed, and then reached a constant pressure after the shape of blebs did not change. The minimum tearing pressure required for the propagation of dissections is called propagation pressure which is 52/spl plusmn/10(SD) mmHg (n=10) in the range of physiological pressure, indicating that the propagation of dissection might be possible in vivo under physiological conditions. Based on the assumptions that each aortic wall has a constant Young's modulus at large strains and a maximum strain, and shear stress is not an important fact involved in dissections, a mathematical model is established for dissections of the aortic wall. The tearing pressure was inversely proportional to both the radii of blebs and the tangents of the angles at the leading edge of dissections before the blebs had a fixed shape, and then kept as a constant when the shape of blebs did not change. The model explained the change of tearing pressure with the geometry of blebs, and predicted tearing pressure would be lower in old human aortas than in young ones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches→French-language works237,207→