Tight error bounds for nonuniform signaling over AWGN channels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider a Bonferroni-type lower bound due to Kounias (1968) on the probability of a finite union. The bound is expressed in terms of only the individual and pairwise event probabilities; however, it suffers from requiring an exponentially complex search for its direct implementation. We address this problem by presenting a practical algorithm for its evaluation. This bound is applied together with two other bounds, a recent lower bound (the KAT bound) and a greedy algorithm implementation of an upper bound due to Hunter (1976), to examine the symbol error (P/sub a/) and bit error (P/sub b/) probabilities of an uncoded communication system used in conjunction with M-ary phase-shift keying (PSK)/quadrature amplitude (QAM) (PSK/QAM) modulations and maximum a posteriori (MAP) decoding over additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels. It is shown that the bounds-which can be efficiently computed-provide an excellent estimate of the error probabilities over the entire range of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) E/sub b//N/sub 0/. The new algorithmic bound and the greedy bound are particularly impressive as they agree with the simulation results even during very severe channel conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.049 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".