MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168936357 · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh612

Chemically induced increases and decreases in the rate of expansion of a CAG{middle dot}CTG triplet repeat

2004· article· en· W2168936357 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mário Gomes‐Pereira

Bibliographic record

VenueNucleic Acids Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoMedical Research CouncilLister Institute of Preventive MedicineUniversity of GlasgowWellcome Trust
KeywordsTrinucleotide repeat expansionBiologyMyotonic dystrophySomatic cellReversionGeneticsMutationDNAMutation rateMutantGeneAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Somatic mosaicism of repeat length is prominent in repeat expansion disorders such as Huntington disease and myotonic dystrophy. Somatic mosaicism is age-dependent, tissue-specific and expansion-biased, and likely contributes toward the tissue-specificity and progressive nature of the symptoms. We propose that therapies targeted at somatic repeat expansion may have general utility in these disorders. Specifically, suppression of somatic expansion would be expected to be therapeutic, whilst reversion of the expanded mutant repeat to within the normal range would be predicted to be curative. However, the effects of genotoxic agents on the mutational properties of specific nuclear genes are notoriously difficult to define. Nonetheless, we have determined that chronic exposure over a three month period to a number of genotoxic agents can alter the rate of triplet repeat expansion in whole populations of mammalian cells. Interestingly, high doses of caffeine increased the rate of expansion by approximately 60%. More importantly, cytosine arabinoside, ethidium bromide, 5-azacytidine and aspirin all significantly reduced the rate of expansion by from 35 to 75%. These data establish that drug induced suppression of somatic expansion is possible. These data also suggest that highly unstable expanded simple sequence repeats may act as sensitive reporters of genotoxic assault in the soma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNucleic Acids ResearchSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207