Establishing Networks of Change: The Second International Encounter of Graduate Programs in Communication, Development and Social Change
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper provides a reflection on the second encounter of graduate programs in communication, held in Bogota on August 26 and 27, 2014 and highlights the University of Guelph’s contribution and initiatives in the field. It explores the perspectives on communication that were reflected throughout the encounter and the processes that facilitated the establishment of “Redecambio”, a network of academic collaboration in this area of knowledge. This encounter proved to be an opportunity to remember history and look to the future with hope and solidarity. Organized as a homage to Bolivian journalist and communication theorist Ramiro Beltran, his theories and accomplishments were a source of inspirations for the university’s students as well as for the international guests. Beltran’s Latin American perspectives on communication as an interactive, social and democratic process fostered an environment of dialogue that facilitated international participation and collaboration. Keywords : Communication for development, University of Guelph, engaged learning, Redecambio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it