MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169100599 · doi:10.1109/cicc.2000.852612

Direct digital frequency synthesis of low-jitter clocks

2002· article· en· W2169100599 on OpenAlexaff
Dorin Calbaza, Yvon Savaria

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNumerical Methods and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccumulator (cryptography)JitterComputer scienceDirect digital synthesizerSynchronization (alternating current)Clock recoveryNTSCDigital televisionElectronic engineeringFrequency dividerClock synchronizationClock domain crossingDigital audioDigital clockFrequency synthesizerAudio signalComputer hardwarePhase-locked loopClock signalHigh-definition televisionSynchronous circuitDigital signal processingTelecommunicationsEngineeringAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of communication systems in the past years has increased the necessity to synthesize very accurate clocks. For example, in Digital Television (DTV) an audio data stream must be inserted into a video data stream, which implies that we must synchronize the audio clock with the video clock. According to one digital audio standard, the audio clock frequency is 5,6448 MHz, and with the PAL digital television standard, the video clock frequency is 35.46895 MHz. In this case, the division ratio is 112896/709379. Other division ratios are required with other DTV standards such as NTSC, SECAM or HDTV, and with other digital audio standard frequencies. Direct Digital Synthesis (DDS) is a popular technique that can be used to derive the audio frequency from the video frequency used as clock. A critical component of a DDS is its phase accumulator, which controls the DDS output frequency. The limited number of bits in the phase accumulator reduces its precision and its ability to express divide ratios defined with large integers. This will produce a phase error that accumulates with time to produce a low-band jitter in the output signal, which is particularly harmful when the output clock is used for synchronization purposes. This paper reviews some circuits found in the literature, which could be used to reduce the phase error given by a phase accumulator, and it presents a new phase correction technique which can give better results in terms of jitter, and which simplify design and implementation of practical DDS circuits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical Methods and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207