Repenser les fondements du régime minier québécois au regard de l’obligation de la Couronne de consulter et d’accommoder les peuples autochtones (Rethinking the Foundations of the Quebec Mining Regime in Relation to the Crown Duty to Consult and Accommodate Aboriginal Peoples)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
French Abstract: Cet article a pour objet d’analyser l’encadrement juridique des activites minieres au Quebec a l’aune des obligations constitutionnelles qui incombent a la province de consulter et d’accommoder les peuples autochtones. L’auteure propose que les fondements du regime minier quebecois, en particulier le principe de la liberte de prospection (« free mining »), sont foncierement incompatibles avec la mise en œuvre par la province de ses obligations constitutionnelles a l’egard des peuples autochtones. Elle est d’avis, en outre, que ni le processus quebecois d’evaluation des repercussions environnementales des projets de developpement, ni les Ententes sur les repercussions et les avantages, du moins dans leur forme actuelle, ne sauraient remedier aux lacunes fondamentales du regime minier. La conciliation des obligations constitutionnelles de la Couronne a l’egard des peuples autochtones, d’une part, et du regime minier quebecois, d’autre part, requerait selon elle une reforme radicale des piliers memes regime minier quebecois voire, le cas echeant, des regimes juridiques connexes.English Abstract: This article purports to analyze the legal framework of mining activities in the province of Quebec in light of the constitutional obligations incumbent on the province to consult and accommodate Aboriginal peoples. The author advances that the foundations of the Quebec mining regime, particularly the principle of free mining, are essentially incompatible with the implementation of its constitutional obligations towards Aboriginal peoples. She also suggests that neither Quebec’s environmental impact project assessment process, nor the “Impact and Benefits Agreements” can, at least in their current form, palliate the fundamental weaknesses of the mining regime. The conciliation between the Crown’s constitutional obligations towards Aboriginal peoples, on one side, and the Quebec mining regime, on the other, would require a radical reform of the pillars of the Quebec mining regime and even, if need be, of the relevant connected legal regimes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".