Incremental Communication for Adaptive Resonance Theory Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have proposed earlier the incremental internode communication method to reduce the communication cost as well as the time of the learning process in artificial neural networks (ANNs). In this paper, the limited precision incremental communication method is applied to a class of recurrent neural networks, the adaptive resonance theory 2 (ART2) networks. Simulation studies are carried out to examine the effects of the incremental communication method on the convergence behavior of ART2 networks. We have found that, 7-13-b precision is sufficient to obtain almost the same results as those with full (32-b) precision conventional communication. A theoretical error analysis is also carried out to analyze the effects of the limited precision incremental communication. The simulation and analytical results show that the limited precision errors are bounded and do not seriously degrade the convergence of ART2 networks. Therefore, the incremental communication can be incorporated in parallel and special-purpose very large scale integration (VLSI) implementations of the ART2 networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it