A study to evaluate the safety of platelet-derived growth factor for treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: An arthroscopic procedure for the treatment of osteochondral defects using platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) carried out in a matrix of tricalcium phosphate was developed. This prospective, case-series-based study was designed to evaluate the safety and clinical utility of this procedure. METHODS: Patients with an isolated osteochondral defect larger than 5 mm long, 3 mm wide, and 5 mm deep and smaller than 30 mm long, 25 mm wide, or 20 mm deep were considered for enrolment. Only patients with chronic lesions were enroled. Arthroscopic debridement was followed by the placement of recombinant human PDGF in a matrix of tricalcium phosphate. The Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and SF-36 questionnaires were administered at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans were taken before and after surgery. RESULTS: Five patients were ultimately enroled in this proof-of-concept trial. All outcome measures demonstrated marked improvement from baseline to final follow-up: The mean weight bearing VAS pain score improved by 49%, and the mean AOS functional score improved by 28%. Bone healing was seen on CT, and reduction in oedema signal was seen on MRI. CONCLUSION: This new procedure may offer a promising alternative for the treatment of osteochondral defects. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm these results and to analyse the long-term effects of the procedure. The clinical relevance of this study is that the procedure may provide a less invasive option with improved bone healing compared to standard techniques . LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".