The Ross procedure in children: preoperative haemodynamic manifestation has significant effect on late autograft re-operation☆
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The Ross procedure is the aortic valve-replacement procedure of choice in children. Nonetheless, late autograft re-operation for dilatation and/or valve regurgitation is of concern. We examined whether preoperative haemodynamic manifestation (e.g., stenosis, regurgitation and mixed aortic valve disease) affected late re-operation risk. METHODS: Medical records of 227 children who underwent the Ross procedure (1991-2004) were reviewed. Competing-risks methodology determined time-related prevalence and associated factors for two mutually exclusive end-states after the Ross procedure: (1) death prior to subsequent autograft re-operation and (2) autograft re-operation, with the remainder of patients being alive and free from subsequent autograft re-operation. RESULTS: There were 162 male patients (71%) in this study. Median age at surgery was 12.1 years (range: 1 week-18 years). The haemodynamic aortic valve dysfunction was primarily stenosis (n=40, 18%), primarily regurgitation (n=109, 48%) and mixed disease (n=78, 35%). Underlying pathology was rheumatic fever (n=104, 46%), congenital heart disease (n=113, 50%) and endocarditis (n=8, 3%). Competing-risks analysis showed that, at 10 years following the Ross procedure, ∼5% of patients had died, 16% had undergone autograft re-operation with aortic valve replacement and 79% were alive and free from autograft re-operation. Ten-year freedom from autograft re-operation for patients with preoperative stenosis, regurgitation and mixed disease was 97%, 69% and 93%, respectively, (p<0.001 for regurgitation vs others). Risk factors for increased risk of autograft re-operation were rheumatic fever (parameter estimates (PEs): 2.09 ± 0.75, p=0.006), and earlier year of surgery (PE: 0.20 ± 0.06, p=0.001). Ten-year freedom from homograft replacement was 81% and was not dependent on haemodynamic manifestation (PE: -0.16 ± 0.38, p=0.68). Significant factors for homograft replacement included fresh homografts (PE: 2.2 ± 0.63, p=0.01) and annular enlargement (PE: 1.11 ± 0.3, p=0.01). Ten-year freedom from cardiac re-operation other than auto-/homograft was 85%, higher in patients with preoperative aortic regurgitation (PE: 1.01 ± 0.42, p=0.02). Concomitant cardiac surgery was a significant factor for late cardiac re-operation other than auto-/homograft replacement (PE: 1.79 ± 0.39, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Ross procedure in children is associated with excellent survival. Late autograft re-operation may be required; however, it is more common in children with preoperative aortic regurgitation, especially those with rheumatic fever. Better patient selection in later era has mitigated the risk of autograft re-operation. Continued improved candidate selection, along with modifications in autograft implantation and root/sinotubular stabilisation techniques, may further decrease late autograft failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".