MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Identification of a twin‐arginine leader‐binding protein

2001· article· en· W2169246184 on OpenAlexaff
Ivan J. Oresnik, Carol L. Ladner-Keay, Raymond J. Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranslocaseBiologyBiochemistryPeriplasmic spaceProtein subunitFusion proteinEscherichia coliArginineOpen reading framePeptide sequenceMolecular biologyAmino acidGeneRecombinant DNAChromosomal translocation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transport and targeting of a number of periplasmic proteins is carried out by the Sec-independent Mtt (also referred to as Tat) protein translocase. Proteins using this translocase have a distinct twin-arginine-containing leader. We hypothesized that specific leader-binding proteins exist to escort proteins to the translocase complex. A fusion was constructed with the twin-arginine leader from dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) reductase, subunit DmsA, to the N-terminus of glutathione-S-transferase. This leader fusion was bound to a glutathione affinity column through which an Escherichia coli anaerobic cell-free extract was passed. Proteins that bound to the leader were then separated and identified by N-terminal sequencing, which identified DnaK and a protein originating from the uncharacterized reading frame ynfI. This gene has been designated dmsD based on the findings presented in this paper. DmsD was purified as a His6 fusion and was shown to interact with preprotein forms of DmsA and TorA (trimethyl amine N-oxide reductase). A strain carrying a dmsD knock-out mutation showed a loss of anaerobic growth on glycerol-DMSO medium and reduced growth on glycerol-fumarate medium. This work suggests that DmsD is a twin-arginine leader-binding protein.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations155
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular MicrobiologySame topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207