‘No one was there to care for us’: Ashodaya Samithi's community-led care and support for people living with HIV in Mysore, India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under the umbrella of the Bill and Melinda Gates-funded HIV initiative in India, the Mysore-based sex workers' (SWs) collective Ashodaya Samithi focused on improving its members' living and working conditions through community-led structural interventions, including community mobilisation, advocacy, peer-led support, and health promotional activities. Based on four months of ethnographic fieldwork, this article examines the care and support activities of one of its sub-wings, Ashraya, which specifically focuses on people living with HIV and AIDS (PLHIV). We first discuss the stigma-related perceptions and experiences of participants in relation to health-care settings and work environment, families and communities, and within varied HIV support networks. We then explore how Ashraya's community-led interventions attempt to challenge the structural forces feeding on and creating stigma. We argue that the current policy focus on the involvement of SWs' collectives in sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention in India is rather limited and should be expanded along the continuum of care and support offered to PLHIV. As suggested in this paper, SWs' organisations may have greater potential to contribute to more than STI prevention work, both within and outside their communities, than currently recognised.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".