MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169342201 · doi:10.3109/00207450109149758

Endogenous Melatonin and Epileptogenesis: Facts and Hypothesis

2001· review· en· W2169342201 on OpenAlexaff
Lee S. Stewart

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Neuroscience · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCircadian rhythm and melatonin
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMelatoninEpileptogenesisDopaminergicDopamineNeuroscienceEpilepsyEndogenyCircadian rhythmInhibitory postsynaptic potentialPsychologyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In human epilepsy, diurnal variation in seizure phenomena suggests the involvement of a time-dependent biological signal. Clinical evidence indicates that in some cases, temporal clustering of epileptic seizures is in phase with the nocturnal rise in circulating melatonin. Although this hormone has been reported to stabilize the brain against seizure-producing stimuli, these pharmacological doses are not representative of physiological conditions but would nonetheless facilitate widespread inhibitory neurotransmission characteristic of traditional anticonvulsants. Instead, it is proposed that endogenous melatonin contributes to epileptiform activity through inhibitory actions on dopaminergic activity. Dopamine is considered a natural downregulator of seizure activity in a number of species, including humans, and numerous lines of evidence suggest that melatonin is capable of stimulating a decrease in dopamine output within areas of the brain thought to participate in the control of epileptic seizures. Pharmacological manipulation of the endogenous melatonin rhythm may provide a useful therapeutic strategy against the occurrence of seizures during increased hormone production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of NeuroscienceSame topicCircadian rhythm and melatoninFrench-language works237,207