MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169483970 · doi:10.1109/edmo.1997.668583

Impact ionization and quantum confinement effects on the microwave performance of narrow bandgap channel millimeter-wave HFETs

2002· article· en· W2169483970 on OpenAlexaff
C. R. Bolognesi, M.W. Dvorak, D. H. Chow

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpact ionizationMicrowaveOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceIonizationBand gapHeterojunctionIndiumExtremely high frequencyPhysicsOpticsIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Millimeter-wave heterostructure field-effect transistors (HFETs) incorporate (Ga,In)As channels with increasingly high indium mole fractions to maximize operating frequencies and minimize noise figures. The ever shrinking channel energy gaps render the devices more susceptible to impact ionization effects. Until recently, the effects of impact ionization on the microwave performance of narrow bandgap channel HFETs have largely been ignored. In the present work, we studied the effects of impact ionization and quantum confinement on the microwave characteristics of narrow bandgap InAs-AlSb millimeter-wave HFETs. In the course of this study, we systematically varied the level of impact ionization in HFETs through the use of quantum confinement and bias conditions, and compared the microwave behavior of InAs-AlSb HFETs (with different quantum well widths) to that of conventional GaAs MESFETs also fabricated in our laboratory. The observed trends in the S-parameter data have enabled us to identify the physical effects of impact ionization on the microwave behavior of narrow-gap channel HFETs. We found that the conventional FET equivalent circuit model is inadequate when devices operate under high impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207