Effects of heating and post-heating equilibration times on soil water repellency
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of variation in heating temperature T (50–300°C), heating duration (20–60 min), and post-heating equilibration times (24–168 h at 20°C and 50% relative humidity) on the wettability, as measured by the Critical Surface Tension (CST) method, of 4 initially water repellent soils from Canada, Portugal, and the UK are reported. All soils show an increase in water repellency following heating at temperatures in the range of 50 to 150°C, followed by a considerable decline after heating to 200–250°C, and, except for one soil, the eradication of repellency after heating to 300°C. For two soils with a comparatively high organic carbon content and fine texture, water repellency levels were also affected by the length of the post-heating equilibration period. The results demonstrate that (i) the common practice of heating samples to 105°C does not provide a viable standard procedure for the measurement of water repellency as it may alter repellency to different degrees, and (ii) where heat treatment is required, a post-heating equilibration time of 24 h is not necessarily sufficient for sample repellency levels to adjust to atmospheric laboratory conditions; therefore it is advisable to prolong equilibration to at least one week prior to measurement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it