MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169512351

A Multi-Group Investigation of the CES-D's Measurement Structure Across Adolescents, Young Adults and Middle-Aged Adults

2002· preprint· en· W2169512351 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2002
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicPsychometric Methodologies and Testing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscriminant validityInternal consistencyHumanitiesPsychologyStructural equation modelingDemographyMathematicsStatisticsClinical psychologyPsychometricsSociologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the present research was to investigate, via multi-group analyses, the dimensional structure of the CES-D (Radloff, 1977) across three age groups. For this, three studies were conducted on cross-sectional samples of French speaking respondents, varying in age and drawn from the Quebec educational system: 599 adolescent high school students, 291 young adults attending university, and 844 middle-aged adult employees of a school board. Five a priori hypothesized models were tested via structural equation modeling: a single-factor, two three-factors, a four-factor and a second-order factor model. The four-factor and the second-order factor model provided the best fit and the latter model remained largely invariant across the groups when tested via multi-group comparisons. Other psychometric characteristics of the French Canadian version of the scale (e.g., test-retest reliability, internal consistency, convergent-discriminant validity) were also shown to be satisfactory. Possible applications of subcomponent scores in research (based on the multidimensional structure of the scale), rather than the commonly used composite CES-D score, are discussed. Le but de cette recherche etait d'evaluer, a l'aide d'analyses multi-groupes, la structure factorielle de notre version francaise du CES-D (Radloff, 1977) parmi trois groupes d'âge. Trois etudes transversales ont ete realisees aupres d'echantillons francophones du Quebec provenant du systeme d'education : 599 eleves du secondaire, 291 etudiants a l'Universite et 844 employes d'une commission scolaire. Cinq modeles a priori ont ete evalues a l'aide d'analyses de modelisation par equations structurales : un modele unidimensionnel, deux modeles a trois dimensions, un modele a quatre facteurs et un modele hierarchique. Les deux derniers modeles se sont averes les meilleurs. Les analyses multi-groupes revelent que le modele hierarchique etait le plus invariant parmi les differents groupes d'âges. D'autres caracteristiques psychometriques de cette version canadienne francaise du CES-D, au niveau de la fiabilite temporelle, de la consistance interne et de la validite convergente-discriminante, se sont averees satisfaisantes. Les implications concernant l'utilisation des scores des dimensions plutot que du score total de l'ensemble de la mesure sont discutees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.062
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.062
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.358
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.053 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it