Changes in Corticospinal Efficacy Contribute to the Locomotor Plasticity Observed After Unilateral Cutaneous Denervation of the Hindpaw in the Cat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We used microwire electrodes chronically implanted into the hindlimb representation of the motor cortex as well as into the pyramidal tract to test the hypothesis that the corticospinal system contributes to the locomotor plasticity that is observed after cutaneous denervation of the cat hindpaw. A total of 23 electrodes implanted into the motor cortex in three cats trained to walk on a treadmill produced phase-dependent, short-latency, twitch responses in hindlimb flexor and extensor muscles during locomotion. After a unilateral cutaneous denervation of the hindpaw, the cats showed transient deficits in locomotion, including a dragging of the hindpaw along the treadmill belt during the swing phase. This deficit rapidly recovered over the course of a few days. The recovery of locomotion was accompanied by an increase in the magnitude of the responses evoked in different muscles by the cortical stimulation at all 23 cortical sites. Response magnitude increased rapidly within the first 1-2 wk postdenervation before attaining a plateau at > or =3 wk. In two cats, for which detailed information was obtained, response magnitude in the knee flexor, semitendinosus (St), was increased by >250% at 14/18 sites (mean increase = 1,235%). Increased responses in the St to stimulation were also observed at two of the four pyramidal tract sites after the denervation but were relatively smaller (max = 593%) than those evoked by the cortical stimulation. We suggest that the denervation produces changes in both cortical and spinal excitability that, together, produce a change in corticospinal efficacy that contributes to the recovery of locomotor function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".