Interaction of 11-cis-Retinol Dehydrogenase with the Chromophore of Retinal G Protein-coupled Receptor Opsin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vertebrate opsins in both photoreceptors and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) have fundamental roles in the visual process. The visual pigments in photoreceptors are bound to 11-cis-retinal and are responsible for the initiation of visual excitation. Retinochrome-like opsins in the RPE are bound to all-trans-retinal and play an important role in chromophore metabolism. The retinal G protein-coupled receptor (RGR) of the RPE and Müller cells is an abundant opsin that generates 11-cis-retinal by stereospecific photoisomerization of its bound all-trans-retinal chromophore. We have analyzed a 32-kDa protein (p32) that co-purifies with bovine RGR from RPE microsomes. The co-purified p32 was identified by mass spectrometric analysis as 11-cis-retinol dehydrogenase (cRDH), and enzymatic assays have confirmed the isolation of an active cRDH. The co-purified cRDH showed marked substrate preference to 11-cis-retinal and preferred NADH rather than NADPH as the cofactor in reduction reactions. cRDH did not react with endogenous all-trans-retinal bound to RGR but reacted specifically with 11-cis-retinal that was generated by photoisomerization after irradiation of RGR. The reduction of 11-cis-retinal to 11-cis-retinol by cRDH enhanced the net photoisomerization of all-trans-retinal bound to RGR. These results indicate that cRDH is involved in the processing of 11-cis-retinal after irradiation of RGR opsin and suggest that cRDH has a novel role in the visual cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".