Improved wavefield reconstruction from randomized sampling via weighted one-norm minimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Missing-trace interpolation aims to recover the gaps caused by physical obstacles or deliberate subsampling to control acquisition costs in otherwise regularly sampled seismic wavefields. Although transform-domain sparsity promotion has proven to be an effective tool to solve this recovery problem, current recovery techniques do not fully utilize a priori information derived from the locations of the transform-domain coefficients, especially when curvelet domain sparsity is exploited. We use recovery by weighted one-norm minimization, which exploits correlations between the locations of significant curvelet coefficients of different partitions, e.g., shot records, common-offset gathers, or frequency slices of the acquired data. We use these correlations to define a sequence of 2D curvelet-based recovery problems that exploit 3D continuity exhibited by seismic wavefields without relying on the highly redundant 3D curvelet transform. To test the performance of our weighted algorithm, we compared recoveries from different data sorting and partitioning scenarios for a seismic line from the Gulf of Suez. These tests demonstrated that our method is superior to standard ℓ1 minimization in terms of antialiasing capability, reconstruction quality and computational memory requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".